Jump to Main Content
Decrease font size Reset font size Increase font size
CUS:  Centre for Urban Schooling Home| OISE| U of T| Portal| Site Map | Contact Us
INSPIRING EDUCATION | oise.utoronto.ca
Centre for Urban Schooling

Pencil crayons

 

Established in 2005, the Centre for Urban Schooling (CUS) connects the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) to urban schools and communities. The Centre conducts research on and advocates for critical practice that is focused on how to better serve historically marginalized and racialized children and youth in public schools. Our research projects include critical practitioner research projects, youth participatory action research (yPAR) projects, and arts-based research projects.

facebooktwitter


Upcoming Events

2016-2017 events TBA

 

 


Past Events

 

April 21, 2016

KITL Lounge, 3-104

6:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.

The Critical Practitioner Research Collaborative in the Centre for Urban Schooling Presents: Collaborative Participatory Research: Invitation, Process, Representation & Publication

The Critical Practitioner Research Collaborative (CPRC) in the Centre for Urban Schooling invites students and faculty from the University of Pennsylvania and OISE to share experiences and perspectives on critical participatory research and practice in education. Join us for a video link discussion and film screening that explores participatory arts-based research with youth, educators, and activists, a forum for participants to respond to the film and connect their individual and collective research interests and projects.

After a simultaneous screening of the film "After Night" (2015) in Toronto and Philadelphia, we invite participants in both communities to engage in discussion via video link about the challenges and potential of collaborative research. What pedagogical and methodological concerns arise in community-based research? What does it mean to regard knowledge production as intrinsically collaborative? How might participatory research provoke new problems and possibilities within the contexts of urban education? How can widening the educational imagination (Greene, 1995) be a means of countering the prevailing notion that arts-based approaches to research and community organizing are not "real" work?

 

March 24, 2016

Room 5-150

4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Title: Volunteer abroad at elite Canadian private schools: Producing young elites through regulated racial encounters

Presenter: Leila Angood, Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre for Urban Schooling

Abstract

The production of young elites as caring national leaders and global citizens requires regulated racial encounters. At Canadian elite schools, these encounters are formulated as multicultural and humanitarian educational experiences. These carefully managed experiences obscure structural inequities and ongoing exploitation to help secure students’ sense of themselves as empowered and capable.

My paper follows the racial routes through which Canadian elite school girls – both white and of colour – use white femininity to secure ruling class status. This ruling class status requires and reproduces a Canadian brand of global citizenship that articulates through national narratives of innocence and moral excellence, particularly in relation to settler colonialism and peacekeeping. These racial routes to ruling class status recruit particular racial others to participate in liberal modernity through the practices and processes of global white supremacy and settler/colonialism, practices that aim to “assist” Black and Indigenous others “into modernity” (Razack, 2004, 2015).

I analyze ethnographic data using a critical race feminist framework to theorize the encounter between girls from an elite Canadian private school and the Zulu children in South African townships that they visited to teach. I discuss several of the techniques, such as enchantment, that the Canadian group deployed as effective self-making strategies that worked to conceal the deep colonial continuities of the encounter.

This paper answers three questions: (1) what is at stake for young elites in this humanitarian encounter?; (2) what is required in order for the humanitarian encounter to work?; and (3) what does this encounter do for young elites and elite Canadian private schools?

This is the story of how Canadian elite schools and students leverage gendered racial hierarchies to secure the material and symbolic advantages of ruling class status.

Biography

Leila Angod is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre for Urban Schooling at OISE/UT. Her current project is a youth participatory action research study of socioeconomic diversity at the University of Toronto Schools. This paper is drawn from Dr. Angod’s doctoral thesis, Behind and beyond the ivy: How schools produce elites through the bodies of racial others, a critical race feminist analysis of the multicultural and humanitarian encounters that are crucial to the formation of elite subjects and elite schools. The topics of her current writing projects include the heteronormative impulse of the volunteer abroad encounter, We Day, and the One Laptop per Child program. Her recent guest editorial in Curriculum InquiryThe unruly curricula of the ruling classes, explores how divergent curricular approaches reproduce rather than disrupt ruling class status at elite private schools.

 

CUS Reserach for Critical Practice in Urban Schools Seminar Series 

 

October 16, 2015

Room 11-135

3:00-4:00 pm

Title: Exploring the relationship between school structure and student belonging

Presenter: Gillian Parekh, SSHRC postdoctoral fellow with the Centre for Urban Schooling

Abstract

In school, students are organized across various programs and enrichment opportunities. Research has demonstrated that there is significant correlation between the representation of disability, class, race, and gender identities to the degree of value assigned to programs and academic streams (Sinay, 2010; Clandfield et. al, 2014). These disparities call into question students’ experiences of social citizenship and belonging within institutions that adhere to the organization of students along constructed notions of ability and meritocracy (Parekh, 2014).  Drawn largely from the Toronto District School Board’s Parent and Student Census data, this paper explores the relationship between institutional programming and students’ experiences in school.

Biography

Gillian Parekh is a SSHRC postdoctoral fellow with the Centre for Urban Schooling in the Department of Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning at OISE. Most recently, Gillian worked as a Research Coordinator for the Toronto District School Board. Her research interests include critical disability studies, institutional organization, and education equity.

 

November 6, 2015

Room 11-164

3:00-4:00 pm

Title: Feeling and hearing the difference: Toward an affective methodology for studying social in/justice in education

Presenter: Lee Airton, Lecturer, Master of Teaching Program and the Current Teacher Ed Program

Abstract

The literature on social justice teacher education (SJTE) is full of specialized language: namely, semantic descriptions of what ‘good’ SJTE looks and sounds like in practice. However, ‘teaching the diversity course’ in pre-service programs is as much an affective proposition – one of intensity, awkwardness, discomfort, welling-up – as a semantic one: what is explicitly stated, whether by teacher candidates or teacher educators. Field leaders (e.g., Zeichner, Ladson-Billings, Cochran-Smith, Grant, Sleeter) have long called for empirical evidence of SJTE’s effectiveness at changing teacher orientations toward social difference in order to benefit their future K-12 pupils. With such evidence in short supply, this study used a post-qualitative methodology and neo-materialist affect- and assemblage-based theoretical framework to explore how SJTE practitioners together produce, in real-time, a sense of ‘good or bad SJTE’ and of themselves as SJTE practitioners. This paper draws on findings from material-discursive fieldwork at education conferences and in SJTE practitioner conversations to argue for a less language-dependent approach to the study of social in/justice in educational contexts.
 

Biography

Dr. Lee Airton is a Lecturer in the Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning at OISE, and received their Ph.D. in 2014 from York University’s Graduate Program in Education. Dr. Airton’s publications on gender and sexual diversity issues in education have appeared in Curriculum Inquiry and Sex Education, and they blog about gender-neutral pronoun usage, user support and non-binary gender identification at theyismypronoun.com. Dr. Airton currently serves on the executive committees of the Canadian Association for Teacher Education and the Queer Studies in Education Special Interest Group of AERA.

 

FREE YOUR MIND: A HIP HOP Education STEMposium

CUS was a co-sponsor for this event which brings together students, educators, 

hip hop academics, and the GTA's finest hip hop education workshop facilitators

 

Check out the documentation from the STEMposium!

 

OISEcms v.1.0 | Site last updated: Monday, August 8, 2016 Disclaimer | Webmaster

© OISE University of Toronto
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6 CANADA